PAWAN SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMJILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7794/2021 · 2026-03-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7794/2021 Pawan Sharma S/o Shri Ramjilal, R/o Kothali, Malarna Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Victim, aged about 27 Years, R/o ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmsheel Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Mr. N.S.Dhakad-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 10/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the impugned FIR No. 277/2021 registered with Police Station Dadabadi, Kota City for the offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 363, 366, 384 and 380 IPC.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever and has falsely been implicated in the present case, hence, interference of this Court is warranted.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that after thorough investigation in the matter, prima facie involvement of the petitioner has been found and several efforts have been made to
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-7794/2021] trace out the petitioner but he is absconding and evading the Police. Hence, interference of this Court is not warranted.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Perusal of the contents of the FIR reveals that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are of a cognizable offence. The correctness of the allegations cannot be adjudicated by this Court at this stage. Certainly this task has been assigned to the Investigating Agency.
6. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate representation before the Investigating Officer. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioner, it is expected from the Investigating Office to look into the matter and submit the conclusion report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the Competent Court of law strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition stands
disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/53