RAJENDRAKUMAR KISHANLAL JAISWAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/848/2021 · 2026-09-08
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 848 OF 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 848 OF 2021 Rajendrakumar Kishanlal Jaiswal Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Undre Vikram S. for the Petitioner • Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.P.P. for State __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Heard. 2) Though direction is sought against Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 for registration of offence under the Cyber Law and the Indian Penal Code, but it appears that, pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 14.09.2020, the Police have already registered N.C. 3) The record shows that, in all, three such non- cognizable reports have been registered at Badnapur Police Station and Kadim Jalna Police Station. 4) The learned A.P.P. submits that, if the petitioner is not satisfied with the registration of N.C., he may file Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:42162-DB
914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 848 OF 2021 private complaint before the concerned Magistrate or point out as to which cognizable offence has been committed by the concerned persons. 5)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file private complaint against the concerned persons, subject to the law of limitation. 6) In view of the above, the petition stands
disposed of with liberty as aforesaid.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 2 of 2