Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2403 (PNJ)

VIRENDER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP/17713/2026 · 2026-07-07

Nidhi Gupta

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17713 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 Virender State of Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. quashing respondent No. 2 whereby that upon scrutiny of the application form it was found that the job application dated whereas the Service Rules, 2021 were in force w.e.f. 26.02.2021 a shall apply afresh under the aforesaid Rules National/International Level Sports Achievements verified from the National Athletic Sports Federation; respondents the Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2018. 17713-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vinay Ahrodia, Advocate for Mr. Anas Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner quashing of order dated 20.12.2023 (Annexure P respondent No. 2 whereby while returning the original form it is that upon scrutiny of the application form it was found that the job application dated 04.12.2023 was submitted under the Policy of 2018; whereas the Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Group Service Rules, 2021 were in force w.e.f. 26.02.2021 a shall apply afresh under the aforesaid Rules National/International Level Sports Achievements verified from the National Athletic Sports Federation; AND respondents to consider and provide appointment to the petitioner under Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2018. - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17713-2026 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vinay Ahrodia, Advocate for Mr. Anas Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana. writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for 20.12.2023 (Annexure P-11) issued by while returning the original form it is stated that upon scrutiny of the application form it was found that the job was submitted under the Policy of 2018; Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Group-A, B and C) Service Rules, 2021 were in force w.e.f. 26.02.2021 and that the petitioner shall apply afresh under the aforesaid Rules, after getting the certificate of National/International Level Sports Achievements verified from the AND in the alternative directing the to consider and provide appointment to the petitioner under Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Recruitment and Conditions of 11) issued by that upon scrutiny of the application form it was found that the job was submitted under the Policy of 2018; A, B and C) nd that the petitioner , after getting the certificate of National/International Level Sports Achievements verified from the in the alternative directing the to consider and provide appointment to the petitioner under Haryana Outstanding Sportspersons (Recruitment and Conditions of RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.08 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-17713 2. to interfere in the matter may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. 3. 4. 5. 07.07.2026 rishu 17713-2026 -2- After arguing for some time when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable - After arguing for some time when this Court is not inclined for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remedy, if any, in with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No After arguing for some time when this Court is not inclined for the petitioner submits that he the petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remedy, if any, in RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.08 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.