ARUN SHAMRAV MHASKE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/1176/2021 · 2026-09-15
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1176.2021WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2021 ARUN SHAMRAV MHASKE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Vikram L. Bhange h/f Mr.Jadhav Kiran D APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. U.S. Bhosale ...
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 15.09.2026 P.C. : . Though learned counsel holding for Mr.Jadhav,
learned counsel for petitioners seeks an adjournment but report of the Resource Personnel clearly indicates that after filing of this petition, the petitioners never cared to remove the office objections. They did not even give the necessary instructions to their own Advocate.
2. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioners are seeking directions for registration of F.I.R. in view of their complaint dated 20.09.2021, however, for that purpose, they are having alternate remedy also.
3. Since, the petitioners are found most negligent in prosecuting the matter, we deem it appropriate to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:42343-DB