GURJANT SINGH v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE (APPEALS), PUNJAB AND ORS
/100/2021 · 2026-05-26
Deepak Manchanda, Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2386 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2386 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
210 LPA-100-2021 (O&M)
Date of Decision:- 26.05.2026 Gurjant Singh
… Appellant Versus Financial Commissioner Revenue (Appeals) and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present:- Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, D.A.G, Punjab. Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
, J. (Oral)
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the present appeal may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further, but the respondents be
directed to conduct remand proceedings in a time bound manner, so that no prejudice is caused to anyone.
2. Ordered accordingly.
3. Keeping in view the fact that enough time has already been elapsed, the authorities concerned are directed to finalize the same within a period of 3 months from receipt of certified copy of this order.
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2026.05.26 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
LPA-100-2021 (O&M) ( 2 )
4. The present appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
5. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI )
JUDGE 26.05.2026 ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) Pankaj JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2026.05.26 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment