SHAIKH AYYUB USMAN PATEL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/613/2021 · 2026-09-07
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2338 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2338 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 13 Cri.WP-613.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 13 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 613 OF 2021 SHAIKH AYYUB USMAN PATEL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Chandrakant Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondents-State. ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. Per Court :
1. Though the petition is filed for direction to respondent Nos.2 and 3 to take action on the basis of the applications dated 19.03.2021 and 19.04.2021 for registration of F.I.R. against respondent No.4, however, record shows that after 01.04.2022 the petitioner never circulated the matter. The petitioner did not even file any rejoinder as directed in the
order dated 01.04.2022.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter. He even did not instruct his own lawyer for four years. Therefore, considering the conduct of the petitioner, it appears that he is not diligent in prosecuting the matter and accordingly the petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde