Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2332 (BOM)

RASHTRAWADI BHIM SENA, AURANGABAD, THROUGH, ITS PRESIDENT, VISHALBHAU S/O KADUBA PAKHARE AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/990/2021 · 2026-09-07

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 17 Cri.WP-990.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 17 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 990 OF 2021 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1459 OF 2023 IN WP/990/2021 RASHTRAWADI BHIM SENA, AURANGABAD, THROUGH, ITS PRESIDENT, VISHALBHAU S/O KADUBA PAKHARE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … None for the petitioners. Mr. R.D. Raut, A.P.P. for respondents-State. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. Per Court : 1. None for the petitioners. 2. The petition appears to be filed for registration of F.I.R. on the basis of complaint dated 20.09.2017. Petitioners have also prayed for recovery of amount of Rs. 18.40 Crores from Empire Mall Pvt. Ltd. However, the record shows that the petitioners were appearing initially and later on notice was issued only to respondent No.3 under order dated 11 January 2023. It further appears that the petitioners did not provide address of respondent No.4, and therefore, notice could not be issued in the year 2023. (2) 17 Cri.WP-990.2021.odt 3. The record further show that thereafter the petitioners did not turn up for complying the order of this Court. Even today also nobody remained present for respondent No.3. Thus, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter, and therefore, the petition stands dismissed alongwith pending criminal application, for want of prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde