(1) 18 Cri.WP-1035.2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 18 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2021 SURESH BARKU MOHITE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Mr. Nandkumar Kingaonkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for respondents-State. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. Per Court : 1. Heard. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions, but the record shows that after filing of this petition in the year 2021, the petitioner never appeared for circulating the matter. It seems that he did not even give any instruction to his own advocate. Therefore, considering the conduct of the petitioner it certainly appears that the petitioner is not at all interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde