1059.21WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 948 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1059 OF 2021 SARANGDHAR SUKHDEO JAIWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.K.D.Khade APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar Advocate for Respondent nos. 3 and 4 : Mr.Satej S. Jadhav Advocate for respondent no. 7 : Mr.V.D.Sapkal, Senior Advocate i/b. Adv.Nikita Gore. ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 04.09.2026 P.C. : 1] Heard. 2] The petition is filed for direction to decide representations of the petitioner dated 21.02.2021 and 20.08.2021 for initiating enquiry against the respondent nos.8 to 13. However, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 i.e. Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, has placed on record communication dated 03.09.2026 issued by the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sillod to the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Chh. Sambhajinagar mentioning that as per the representations of the petitioner, 2026:BHC-AUG:41456-DB 1059.21WP 2 the enquiry has been initiated and the petitioner is also called for adducing documents and evidence, if any. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 further submits that enquiry will be conducted within four weeks. 3] We record this statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of this Writ Petition, with direction to the respondent nos.3 and 4 to complete the enquiry by giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned within four weeks. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC