ASHOK TRIMBAK MADHIKAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/131/2021 · 2026-09-03
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2301 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 2301 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 917- Cri.W. P. 131-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 131 OF 2021 ASHOK TRIMBAK MADHIKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. APP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Pallav Sinha h/f Mr. S. V. Adwant ......
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2026
ORDER:-
1. Though the learned counsel representing the petitioner has been elevated as Judge of this Court, but on perusal of the record it appears that the direction is sought by the petitioner to initiate criminal prosecution against respondent No.10-company for illegal excavation.
2. However, the learned A.P.P., on instructions submits that, the matter was inquired by police personnel and it was found that the offence under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code was appeared to be committed, and therefore, the police personnel forwarded the applications of the petitioner for further inquiry to Revenue Department.
(2) 917- Cri.W. P. 131-2021.odt
3. Under such circumstances, it will be the responsibility of the Revenue Officer to take any action, if permissible under law, against the respondent No.10. No direction can be given at this juncture to respondent Nos.8 and 9, who are the police officials.
4. As such, the petition stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/