104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8606-2021(O&M) Date of Decision: 16.03.2026 Pragyaware Informatics Private Limited ….Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Vinod Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana Mr. Sharan Sethi, Advocate for respondeents No. 2 and 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to make payment of Rs. 19,50,760/- along with interest with respect of construction work carried out by it for Municipal Corporation, Karnal. 2. The petitioner is claiming that it has completed work of design development, customization, configuration, installation, testing of Citizen Services Delivery Solution. The Assistant IT Manager, Municipal Corporation, Karnal vide communication dated 28.03.2018 has informed that application has been tested and found to be working as per requirement. In view of aforesaid letter, the respondent is liable to make payment. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.16 04:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No. 8606-2021(O&M)




 3. The Municipal Corporation, Karnal has filed affidavit disclosing that letter dated 28.03.2018 is a forged and fabricated document. Mr. Vikas Gupta has confirmed that he has not issued any such letter. 4. From the perusal of record and arguments of both sides, it is evident that claim made by petitioner is disputed by respondents. This Court cannot issue direction to respondents to make payment of disputed liability while exercising writ jurisdiction. 5. The petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner to avail remedies as permissible by law. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 16.03.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.16 04:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document