Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2209 (BOM)

VIJAY DNYANOBA RAUT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/182/2021 · 2026-09-02

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

921 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 182 OF 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 182 OF 2021 Vijay Dnyanoba Raut Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Sahil S. Jawale h/f. Adv. Awasarmol Rahul O. for the Petitioner Mr. Rajdeep D. Raut, A.P.P. for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Although the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions, the record shows that, after filing this petition, even notices were not issued to the respondents and the petitioner has also failed to remove the office objections till today. 2) Under such circumstances, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently, as he has not given any instructions to his own advocate. As such, we dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:40396-DB