(1) 918- Cri. W. P. 158-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2021 RAJKARAN BHANAJI MORE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Pratiksha A.Borse h/f Mr. Balbhim R. Kedar APP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 : Mr. G.R. Syed .. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2026 ORDER:- 1. Though the learned counsel holding for Mr. B.R. Kedar seeks time to take instructions, but record shows that the petitioner did not follow the direction given by this Court, by providing necessary copies for issuance of notice to respondent Nos. 2 and 3, since 2022. Further it appears that, the petitioner has also failed to give any instruction to his own Advocate. 2. Under such circumstances, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. Today also the petitioner is not present. (2) 918- Cri. W. P. 158-2021.odt 3. As such, petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/