Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2204 (BOM)

VINAYAK CORE UNIT PROPRIETARY FIRM THROUGH PROP. SANDIP S/O BALU SHEWALE v. GOURAV S/O ARJUN PATIL AND ANR

WP/1462/2021 · 2026-09-03

Criminal Appealbody2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-WP-1462-2021 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 1462 OF 2021 Vinayak Core Unit Proprietary Firm, Through Prop. Sandip S/o Balu Shewale … Petitioner Versus Gourav S/o Arjun Patil & Anr. … Respondents —————— Mr. Yogesh P. Morbale for the Petitioner. Mr. S.H. Yadav, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2-State. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 3rd September 2026. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Yogesh Morbale, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2-State. 2. By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following substantive relief. “a) This Hon'ble Court by issuing appropriate writ, order and by exercising powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India be pleased to quash and set aside the Impugned Impugned order dated 20/2/2021 passed by Hon'ble Add. osk 1 of 2 3-WP-1462-2021 (CR).docx District and Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2020 arising from Judgment dated 29/11/2019 passed in S.C.C Case No. 685 of 2016.” 3. Mr. Yogesh Morbale, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that this Petition is rendered infructuous and therefore seeks disposal of the same. 4. Mr. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent No.2-State does not oppose the said request. 5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Yogesh Morbale, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, this Petition is dismissed as infructous. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of 2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.03 20:22:18 +0530