IN TH 104 Neer Kum T.L. Satya Departmen CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Kumar and petition wa counsel for 13.01.2021 concerned the authori authority w of this ord COCP-4893-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4893 o Date of decision Kumar and others Versus Satya Prakash, Commissioner & rtment Haryana, Chandigarh and a AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Vijay Pal, Advocate and Mr. Akash Lather, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 13.2.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP- ar and others vs. State of Haryana a ion was disposed of on the basis of s sel for the State to the effect that “… 2021 (Annexure P-8) has been rec ned authorities and the same is still thorities concerned, the same will b ity within a period of eight weeks of order by passing an appropriate s 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4893 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-11.02.2026 …..Petitioners er & Secretary to Transport and another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA and cate dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- -18589-2021 titled as “Neer yana and another”, whereby the is of statement given by learned “…in case, the representation received in the office of the still pending consideration with ill be decided by the competent s of the receipt of certified copy te speaking order and in case, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.13 09.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document after the d the same w weeks there claimed, du their inform that the pe and that th weeks from State, learn contempt p may be gr petition in stipulated t counsel for with the lib February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-4893-2025 (O & M) he decision, the petitioners are foun me will be extended to them withi thereafter and if the petitioners are n d, due reasons be mentioned and su formation and necessary action….” Learned counsel for the Stat the petitioners have been given pers that the speaking order shall be pas s from today. In view of the statement made , learned counsel for the petitioners empt petition may be disposed of at t be granted to the petitioners to rev ion in case the needful is not done lated time. Accordingly, in view of the s sel for the parties, the present contem the liberty aforesaid to the petitioners. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 11, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 found entitled for any benefit, ithin a further period of four are not entitled for any relief as d supplied to the petitioners for ….”. e State, on instructions, submits n personal hearing on 06.2.2026 be passed positively within four t made by learned counsel for the tioners submits that the present of at this stage, however, liberty to revive the present contempt t done by the State within the f the statement made by learned contempt petition is disposed of ioners. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.13 09.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document