Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RSA-396-20
IN THE HIG 275
Dakshin Har
Farukh
CORAM: H
Present: -
NIDHI GUP
1.
record.
2.
concurrent j whereby the respondent
3.
that the que jurisdiction Electricity A Bench of th Sub Division
4.
and the suit 2021 (O&M)
-1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA
RSA
Date o
Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Versus
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Madhur Singh, Advocate fo
Mr. Jamshed Ahmed, Advocate
I GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Vakalatnama filed on behalf o
The appellant-defendant is in rrent judgments and decrees rendered by the suit for declaration with perm dent-plaintiff was decreed.
At the very outset, learned cou e question of law involved in the p ction of the Civil Court is barred in icity Act, 2003, has since been decid of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j
In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plain
ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-396-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.01.2026
.… Appellant
.... Respondent
NIDHI GUPTA cate for the appellant. vocate for the respondent. half of the respondent is taken on is in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts permanent injunction filed by the d counsel for the appellant submits the present appeal as to whether red in view of Section 145 of the decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiff stands dismissed on the on the urts the
ther the sion vs.
the RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.
RSA-396-20
ground of ju take recours law.
5.
made in the judicata in plaintiff.
6.
29.01.2026 rishu
2021 (O&M)
-2- d of jurisdiction. However, the respon ecourse to the appropriate remedy as
It is made clear that any ev n the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings
Pending application(s), if any, s 2026
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to dy as available, in accordance with ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No y to with ions es RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.29 18:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.