Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2144 (PNJ)

OM PARKASH AND OTHERS v. CHUNNI RAM AND ANOTHER

CR/956/2021 · 2026-03-18

Harkesh Manuja

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Om Parkash and others Vs Chunni Ram and another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. for Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the respondents. HARKESH MANUJA, J. ( By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated Sirsa, whereby the revenue authorities were directed to take assistance of the plaintiffs/ respondents and the SHO concerned for restoration of passage over the suit property with respect to which granted by the learned of consideration upon interim stage. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are revision petition can be disposed of finally adjudicate either on the date fixed or within 15 days thereafter and till then the quo be maintained. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-956-2021 Date of Decision: Om Parkash and others Chunni Ram and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr.Ajay Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to order dated 05.04.2021 passed by the learned Sirsa, whereby the revenue authorities were directed to take assistance of the plaintiffs/ respondents and the SHO concerned for restoration of passage over the suit property with respect to which granted by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 at the time of consideration upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Learned counsel for the parties are on can be disposed of by directing the learned adjudicate upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC either on the date fixed or within 15 days thereafter and till then the be maintained. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.03.2026 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to ssed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Sirsa, whereby the revenue authorities were directed to take assistance of the plaintiffs/ respondents and the SHO concerned for restoration of passage over the suit property with respect to which a status quo order was rial Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 at the time the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 at the Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the present by directing the learned Trial Court to upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC either on the date fixed or within 15 days thereafter and till then the status 1 By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Sirsa, whereby the revenue authorities were directed to take assistance of the plaintiffs/ respondents and the SHO concerned for restoration of order was rial Court vide order dated 10.03.2021 at the time at the that the present rial Court to upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC status SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.20 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. In view of the aforesaid counsel for respective parties, the present petition is disposed of with a request to the 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC preferred at the instance on the date fixed or 15 days thereafter It may be influenced by the order dated 22.04.2021 passed by this Court at the time of adjudication upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. 4. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 18.03.2026 sanjay Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable In view of the aforesaid consented counsel for respective parties, the present petition is disposed of with a the learned Trial Court to dispose of the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC preferred at the instance on the date fixed or 15 days thereafter, after hearing both the parties. It may be clarified here that the learned influenced by the order dated 22.04.2021 passed by this Court at the time on upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No consented stand taken by learned counsel for respective parties, the present petition is disposed of with a rial Court to dispose of the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC preferred at the instance of respondent No.1, either after hearing both the parties. here that the learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the order dated 22.04.2021 passed by this Court at the time on upon the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 learned counsel for respective parties, the present petition is disposed of with a rial Court to dispose of the application under Order either rial Court shall not be influenced by the order dated 22.04.2021 passed by this Court at the time Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.20 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document