IN TH 103+205 Mohinder Sh. Anur Governme Secretaria CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU CM-24337 placing on 01.04.2021 31.03.2024 01.04.2025 31.03.2022 bank statem COCP-199-2022 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Misc. No.24 COCP No.199 of Date of decision inder Singh …..Ap Versus Anurag Agarwal, IAS, Addition ernment of Punjab, Department of C etariat-2, Sector-9, State of Punjab, AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Deepak K. Bartia, Advoca for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Mr. R.M. Sharma, Advocate fo HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 24337-CII-2025 Prayer in this application is ng on record the RD Reports from 4.2021 to 31.03.2022, 01.04.2022 to 3.2024, 01.04.2024 to 31.03.2025, re 4.2025, trading, profit and loss a 3.2022, 31.03.2023, 31.03.2024, 31.03 statement as Annexures R-5/2 to R-5/ 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH . No.24337-CII-2025 in/and 199 of 2022 cision :-24.02.2026 Applicant-Petitioner ditional Chief Secretary to nt of Cooperation, Punjab Civil njab, Chandigarh and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate i, AAG Punjab. cate for respondent No.5. ion is for placing on record for from 01.04.2020 to 31.03.2021, 22 to 31.03.2023, 01.04.2023 to 25, report of salary paid as on oss account dated 31.03.2021, , 31.03.2025 and 02.11.2025 and 5/14. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document and the afo to R-5/14 COCP No. violation o ordinate Be Singh vs. disposed of on the Leg with law ex from the re that in com 08.02.2022 authority a with. in the sai acknowledg towards the that the res on account Secretary. COCP-199-2022 (O & M) The application is allowed su the aforesaid documents are taken on 5/14. P No.199 of 2022 (O & M) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 03.12.2021 (Ann ate Bench of this Court in CWP-2457 h vs. State of Punjab and others”, sed of with a direction “….to respond Legal Notice dated 26.10.2021 (An w expeditiously and, in any case, wi e receipt of a certified copy of this o Learned counsel appearing fo in compliance with the aforesaid dire 2.2022 (Annexure R-5/1) has been dul rity and, thus, the mandate of the w Learned counsel for the petitio e said Resolution (Annexure R-5/ owledged that an amount of Rs.1 rds the petitioner on account of arrears In response, learned counsel fo the respondent No.5–Society is facing ccount of alleged embezzlement of Rs. etary. It is submitted that at the releva 2 ed subject to all just exceptions en on record as Annexures R-5/2 ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 24574-2021 titled as “Mohinder ers”, whereby the petition was pondent No.5 to take a decision (Annexure P-4) in accordance e, within a period of two months his order….” ing for respondent No.5 submits directions, a Resolution dated en duly passed by the competent the writ Court stands complied petitioner, however, submits that 5/1), the respondents have f Rs.11,08,621/- is outstanding arrears of salary. nsel for respondent No.5 clarifies facing acute financial constraints of Rs.20,00,000/- by its previous relevant time, the petitioner was VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document working as demand fo that an am petitioner, petitioner. to the Soc proceeds th an outstand the directio legal notic Resolution with the sa jurisdiction enforcemen the order da disposed of of. February Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-199-2022 (O & M) ing as a peon with the said Secreta nd for salary for a period of four ye an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- has a ioner, which fact is not disputed by ioner. Additionally, it is pointed out th ociety amounting to Rs.3,31,000/ eeds thereof are being retained by resp tstanding loan liability of the Society. Having considered the rival su irection issued by the writ Court was notice within the stipulated peri lution dated 08.02.2022 satisfies the the said direction. The present procee diction cannot be converted into e rcement of the claimed monetary benef In view of the above, no case rder dated 03.12.2021 is made out. Accordingly, the present c of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any uary 24, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 ecretary and had not raised any our years. It is further submitted has already been paid to the ted by learned counsel for the out that certain items belonging 1,000/- have been sold, but the by respondent No.6–Bank against ociety. ival submissions, it is evident that rt was to take a decision on the d period. The passing of the s the requirement of compliance proceedings under the Contempt into execution proceedings for benefits. o case for wilful disobedience of sent contempt petition stands if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document