DAILY LOK ADALAT 517 FAO-506-2021 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, V/S MAM CHAND AND ORS. Present: of the learned MACT has been challenged on two counts i.e. the passengers in the vehicle being gratuitous and recovery rights have been granted in favour of the company whereas liability to pay been on the private respondents. He however, states that amount of compensation as awarded by the learned Tribunal has already been paid by the Insurance company. company to our mind is that recovery rights should not have been granted and the liability in the first instance should have been put on the private respondents. This appeal is rendered infructuous and is d appropriate steps in accordance with law to recover the amount of compensation from the private respondents. connected cases. 01.05.2026 sd DAILY LOK ADALAT 2021 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, V/S MAM AND ORS. Mr.Yogesh Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Sumit Garg, Advocate for Mr.R.C.Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the Insurance company states that award of the learned MACT has been challenged on two counts i.e. the passengers in the vehicle being gratuitous and recovery rights have been granted in favour of the company whereas liability to pay on the private respondents. He however, states that amount of compensation as awarded by the learned Tribunal has already been paid by the Insurance company. From the circumstances, the only grievance of the Insurance to our mind is that recovery rights should not have been granted and the liability in the first instance should have been put on the private respondents. However, the amount of compensation This appeal is rendered infructuous and is d However, it shall be open to the Insurance company to take appropriate steps in accordance with law to recover the amount of compensation from the private respondents. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the ted cases. 01.05.2026 BENCH NO.3 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, V/S MAM Mr.Sumit Garg, Advocate for Mr.R.C.Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. Learned counsel for the Insurance company states that award of the learned MACT has been challenged on two counts i.e. the passengers in the vehicle being gratuitous and recovery rights have been granted in favour of the company whereas liability to pay should have on the private respondents. He however, states that amount of compensation as awarded by the learned Tribunal has already been paid From the circumstances, the only grievance of the Insurance to our mind is that recovery rights should not have been granted and the liability in the first instance should have been put on the private However, the amount of compensation has been deposited. This appeal is rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. However, it shall be open to the Insurance company to take appropriate steps in accordance with law to recover the amount of compensation from the private respondents. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the (M.S. CHAUHAN) PRESIDENT (B.S. WALIA) MEMBER IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, V/S MAM Learned counsel for the Insurance company states that award of the learned MACT has been challenged on two counts i.e. the passengers in the vehicle being gratuitous and recovery rights have been hould have on the private respondents. He however, states that amount of compensation as awarded by the learned Tribunal has already been paid From the circumstances, the only grievance of the Insurance to our mind is that recovery rights should not have been granted and the liability in the first instance should have been put on the private been deposited. However, it shall be open to the Insurance company to take appropriate steps in accordance with law to recover the amount of Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the ) PRESIDENT ) SUDHIR KUMAR 2026.05.04 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document