114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26075-2021 Date of Decision : 29.04.2026 NAVEEN MANOCHA .....Petitioner VERSUS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. L.S.Virk, Addl.Standing Counsel and Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate, for respondents no.1 to 4-UT. None for respondent no.5 KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the supervening events, as disclosed in the written statement filed on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4-UT, Chandigarh, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly, concedes that the prayer, as made through the instant writ petition by the petitioner has been rendered infructuous. However, he seeks a liberty to the petitioner, to approach the authority concerned, to raise his grievance, if any. 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, with the aforesaid liberty. 3. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) April 29, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.04.29 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document