CRM-M-66517- IN THE H (240) BINDER STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. A MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 17 Ambala City, Dist 2. As p 14.06.2021 registe Cantt was pending one Shubham who bail vide order d 10.03.2023. One certain questions, -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Gursewak Singh, Advocate for th Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.014 ns 177, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and istrict Ambala. As per the allegations, the case registered under Section 379A of IP ending before the Court of Sessions Ju m who was nominated as an accused rder dated 09.02.2023. Bonds were One Surjit Singh stood surety for acc tions, he was perplexed and then tried JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-66517-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
for the petitioner aryana by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short <BNSS=) for grant 0144 dated 10.03.2023 registered 1 and 120B of IPC at Police Station case bearing FIR No.225 dated of IPC at Police Station Ambala ions Judge, Ambala. In the said case cused, had been extended benefit of s were furnished on his behalf on accused Shubham. On asking of n tried to flee. He was apprehended 2026 oner
dent
ction grant tered ation ated bala case fit of lf on ng of nded AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-66517- by Naib Court and impersonated him who had managed the aforemention initiated. The co statement on the additional accused statement of co petitioner, he had The petitioner was 3. It is a falsely implicated accused though he effected from him the co-accused to Dharam Singh hav the same benefit. at all attracted ag purpose. It is, the bail. 4. Status vehemently argue offender since on -2025 (O&M) 2 and it was found that his actual nam d himself. He was accompanied with naged to flee from the spot. On repo entioned FIR was registered. Inv he co-accused was arrested subseque n the basis of which the present ccused and was arrested on 03.07.2 f co-accused Vinod Kumar, on th e had furnished surety bonds by imp er was arrested on 03.07.2025. Investi It is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case on the basis of di ugh he had no part to play in the occu m him. There is no material on record sed to appear as false surety. The c gh have been extended benefit of bai nefit. The ingredients for commission ted against him. His further detentio is, therefore, argued that the petition Status report and custody certific argued by learned State counsel tha ce one case of similar nature is pen ual name was Vinod Kumar and had d with the co-accused Sunil Kumar n reporting the matter to the Police, Investigation proceedings were bsequently. He suffered disclosure esent petitioner was nominated as 3.07.2025. As per the disclosure on the instigation of the present y impersonating some other person. Investigation now stands completed. l for the petitioner that he has been s of disclosure statement of the co- e occurrence. No recovery has been record to show that he had instigated The co-accused Vinod Kumar and of bail. On parity, he too deserves ission of offences of forgery are not etention would not serve any useful etitioner deserves to be released on ertificate have been filed. It is sel that the petitioner is a habitual is pending against him. There are had umar , were sure d as sure esent rson. been - been ated and erves e not seful on It is itual e are AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-66517- chances of his co therefore, stressed 5. This C for both the parties 6. The p days. The subjec take time to concl examined so far. of similar nature b is well settled prop of post-conviction Taking into consi petitioner in custo circumstances but case, this Court is case for grant of ordered to be rele bonds to the Magistrate/Duty M 7. In the petitioner, it shal application seekin -2025 (O&M) 3 his committing similar offences, if ex ressed that he does not deserve to be re This Court has heard the rival submis parties at considerable length. The petitioner is in custody for a per subject offences are triable by Magist conclude since only 02 out of 16 pro . Though the petitioner is stated ture but he cannot be denied benefit o d proposition of law that pre-trial inca viction sentencing and bail is the r consideration the above discussed f custody, the role attributed to him es but without meaning to make any ourt is of the considered opinion that ant of bail. As such the petition is be released on bail, subject to his fu the satisfaction of the learned uty Magistrate concerned. In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent to seeking cancellation of bail. s, if extended benefit of bail. It is, o be released on bail. ubmissions made by learned counsel r a period of over 07 months and 07 Magistrate. The trial will obviously 16 prosecution witnesses have been stated to be involved in another case nefit of bail on this ground alone. It al incarceration should not be replica the rule and jail is an exception. ssed facts, the period spent by the to him and the attendant facts and e any comment on the merit of the at the petitioner has made out a ion is allowed and the petitioner is his furnishing personal and surety arned trial Court/Chief Judicial y FIR/complaint lodged against the dent to seek redressal by filing an s, unsel 07 usly been case It plica tion. the and f the out a er is urety l t the g an AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-66517- 8. Since any, is rendered in 10.02.2026 Amit Sharma


-2025 (O&M) 4 Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.