Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-9356-2021 Date of Decision : April 17, 2026 RAMESH KUMAR -PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. -RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Manpreet, Advocate, for Ms. Anju Arora, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the same position prevailed on the previous date of hearing as well. It appears that either the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed or the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) April 17, 2026
JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.04.21 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment