Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2021 DAILYLAW 2018 (PNJ)

GURDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

CWP/6320/2026 · 2026-04-10

Namit Kumar

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

114. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gurdeep Singh and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the against vacant posts of Clerks after giving them the benefit of letter dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure P consider the case of the petitioners along with similarly situ in CWP No.31135 of 2024, in terms of order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure P-11). 2. adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the present petition. 4. 10.04.2026 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurdeep Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None for the petitioners. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners against vacant posts of Clerks after giving them the benefit of letter dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure P-7). Further, respondent No.3 be directed to consider the case of the petitioners along with similarly situ CWP No.31135 of 2024, in terms of order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.02.2026, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. Case has been called twice, how appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the present petition. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6320-2026 Date of decision: 10.04.2026 .... Petitioners .... Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners against vacant posts of Clerks after giving them the benefit of letter dated Further, respondent No.3 be directed to consider the case of the petitioners along with similarly situated employees CWP No.31135 of 2024, in terms of order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.02.2026, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. Case has been called twice, however, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are prosecution. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners against vacant posts of Clerks after giving them the benefit of letter dated Further, respondent No.3 be directed to ated employees CWP No.31135 of 2024, in terms of order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.02.2026, the case was ever, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.04.10 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document