Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 1969 (BOM)

SUNANDA SHRIRAM KATHAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/2933/2019 · 2026-08-11

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

904-WP.11919.2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO. 11919 OF 2021 Dr. Dadasaheb Hanumatrao Dhage ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Others …..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2019 Dr. Sunanda Shriram Kathar ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Others …..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.3056 OF 2019 Dr. Prashant Pandharinath Khandagale ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.3057 OF 2019 Dr. Omprakash s/o Baswant Kadam ….Petitioner VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents ….. Mr. M. P. Kale, Advocate for the Petitioner in all WP. Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondents-State. ….. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 11th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : ORDER IN WP No.2933 of 2019 :- 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. Sayyed 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:35394-DB 904-WP.11919.2021 3. Leave granted. 4. Writ petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. ORDER IN WP Nos.11919 of 2021 and 3057 of 2019 and 3056 of 2019 :- 5. Writ Petition Nos. 3057 of 2019 and 3056 of 2019 are not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the present petitions are squarely covered by the judgment delivered by this Court in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026 and other connected writ petitions. 7. In view of judgment in Writ Petition No.6549 of 2026 alongwith connected matters. All the petitions stand disposed off. 8. Needless say that interim relief stands vacated. 9. At this stage, learned Advocate prays that the interim relief is running since last so many years and the same be continued for further period of six weeks. Considering that, even in the above group of petitions, this Court had granted stay for six months from the operation of the order passed by this Court, there shall be interim relief already granted for a further period of six weeks. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Sayyed 2/2