Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2021 DAILYLAW 1934 (BOM)

MAROTI TULSHIRAM NAGAPURE AND OTHERS v. SAU. SINDHU VASANTA NIKHADE AND ANOTHER

SA/125/2021 · 2026-03-18

Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02. SA 125 of 2021.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.125/2021 Maroti Tulshiram Nagapure and others ...Versus… Sau. Sindhu Vasanta Nikhade and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18/03/2026 1. The present appeal was filed on 18/09/2019. It is listed time and again for hearing on admission and for framing substantial questions of law, however, submission on the point of admission have not been advanced till date. 2. On the previous date i.e. on 07/03/2026, there was no appearance on behalf of the appellants even on second call. Accordingly, the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption “for dismissal orders”. 3. Today, even on second call, none appears for the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Wadkar 2026:BHC-NAG:4564