Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2021 DAILYLAW 1933 (BOM)
LALSINGH S/O MOTILAL THAKUR v. SHANKAR S/O KHUMAN CHAUHAN AND OTHERS
SA/89/2021 · 2026-03-18
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2021
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1933 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1933 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
01. SA 89 of 2021.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.89/2021 Lalsingh s/o Motilal Thakur ...Versus… Shankar s/o Khuman Chauhan and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 18/03/2026
1. The present appeal was filed on 05/12/2019. Since then it is listed for hearing on admission and for framing substantial questions of law on five occasions. None appeared on behalf of the appellant on all five dates. Vide order dated 07/03/2026, appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption “for dismissal orders”.
2. Today, even on second call, none appears for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Wadkar 2026:BHC-NAG:4563