NAMDEO S/O ANANDRAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR , DIST. COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, NANDED
CA/4207/2021 · 2026-01-28
Shri Rajnish R Vyas
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1893 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1893 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
926.CA.4207.2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4207 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 21477 OF 2020 Namdeo s/o Anandrao Patil ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents *** Mr. S. R. Bagal h./f Mr. Gadegaonkar Bharat N., Advocate for the Mr. V. S. Badakh, AGP for Respondent – State. *** CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. DATE : JANUARY 28, 2026 PER COURT :
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 322 days in filing the first appeal challenging the award passed by the Reference Court in LAR No.91 of 2014.
2. The claimant has submitted that it is due to covid-19 pandemic lock down and lack of public transport, the claimant could not visit the office of the advocate, so also could not arrange the necessary fees for filing of the appeal. It is submitted that the claimant is from poor family and therefore, the appeal was not filed within the time bound period. Shrikant Malani 2026:BHC-AUG:3672
926.CA.4207.2021
3. The learned APP opposes the application and contends that the delay is not properly explained.
4. In view of the fact that the applicant was a poor person and he has explained the delay in a proper manner. Accordingly, the present application is allowed, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- be paid to the Library of the Advocates Association of Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. The delay is condoned, subject to the applicant giving undertaking that he will not claim interest for the delayed period.
5. Since the application is disposed of, the appeal be registered accordingly.
( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. ) Shrikant Malani