PURUSHOTTAM S/O MADHUKAR KSHIRSAGAR and ANR. v. NAGENDR AS/O MURLIDHAR KSHIRSAGAR
SA/230/2021 · 2026-01-23
Vrushali V Joshi
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1855 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1855 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
67-SA-230-2021.docx VRJ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.230 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2021 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.230 OF 2021 Purshottam S/o Madhukar Kshirsagar & Anr. … Appellants V/s. Nagendra S/o Murlidhar Kshirsagar … Respondent Mr. P. G .Sarda (through V.C.) for the appellants. Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the respondent.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : JANUARY 23, 2026 P.C.:
1.
Learned counsel for the respective parties are present before the Court. Learned counsel for the appellants has appeared through video conferencing.
2.
Learned counsel for the respective parties collectively submit that the matter has been settled between the parties before the learned Mediator. The Mediator has filed his mediation report.
3. The compromise pursis forms part of the record. On perusal thereof, it appears to be duly signed by the respective parties. 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2026.01.23 15:35:41 +0530
67-SA-230-2021.docx
4. In view of the consent terms and the submissions made by
learned counsel for the respective parties, the Second Appeal stands disposed of.
5. A consent decree shall be drawn in terms of the consent terms.
6. The Civil Application also stands disposed of.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) 2