HEMLATA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY. FOOD and CIVIL SUPPLIES and ORS.
WRIA/9274/2021 · 2026-07-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9274 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mahendra Pratap Singh, Rahul Shukla, Shubhra Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Hemlata Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. Food And Civil Supplies And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench