PARAMDISH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MADHYAMIC SHIKSHA LKO and ORS
WRIA/24974/2021 · 2026-02-06
Shree Prakash Singh
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 24974 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhakar Mishra, Ram Bali Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Paramdish Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Madhyamic Shiksha Lko And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench