IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.645 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19727 of 2019 ====================================================== Laxmina Kumari @ Kumari Laxmina Kumari Daughter of Sri Hariwansh Bind, Resident of Village-Uparauli, P.S.-Ramgardh Upari, District Kaimur at Bhabhua. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Sri Ranjeet Kumar Singh, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2. Sri Sanjeev Kumar, the District Education Officer, Rohtas. 3. Sri Keshav Prasad, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas. 4. The Block Education Officer, Kochas, District-Rohtas. 5. The Headmaster, N.P.S., Tiwaripur, Anchal-Kochas, District-Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Abhanjali, AC to GA-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 10-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for initiation of contempt proceeding against opposite parties who knowingly, deliberately and willfully flouted judicial order-dated 24.09.2019 in C.W.J.C. No. 19727 of 2019 Laxmina Kumari @ Kumari Laxmina Kumari Versus The State of Bihar & Ors passed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upadhyay 'J' whereby his lordships was pleased to disposed of the writ petition Patna High Court MJC No.645 of 2021(4) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 by directed the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas to cause an enquiry on the claim of the petitioner and on verification of record, if the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas came to a conclusion that the appointment of the petitioner is legal and valid and he has actually worked for the period, he is claiming salary he will pass appropriate order for payment of salary at the carliest, preferably within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has been complied. 4. In that background, the MJC No. 645 of 2021 is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U