Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2021 DAILYLAW 1137 (AP)

Smt.BalivadaKalyani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7375/2021 · 2026-09-09

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010128242021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 7375/2021 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.BALIVADAKALYANI, W/o. MANI, AGE 50 YEARS, R/o. BALIVADA VILLAGE, ARASAVELLI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. BALIVADA MANI, S/O NARAYANAMURTHY, AGE 52 YEARS, OCCU. POLICE CONSTABLE PC NO 710, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASST SUB INSPECTOR (ASI) AT TRAFFIC POLICE STATION IIIRD TOW DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of action of the 2nd Respondent in not acting upon the representations IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 7375/2021 SMT.BALIVADAKALYANI, W/o. MANI, AGE 50 YEARS, R/o. BALIVADA VILLAGE, ARASAVELLI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. BALIVADA MANI, S/O NARAYANAMURTHY, AGE 52 YEARS, OCCU. POLICE CONSTABLE PC NO 710, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASST SUB INSPECTOR (ASI) AT TRAFFIC POLICE STATION IIIRD TOWN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature in WRIT of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in not acting upon the representations [3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO SMT.BALIVADAKALYANI, W/o. MANI, AGE 50 YEARS, R/o. BALIVADA VILLAGE, ARASAVELLI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, BALIVADA MANI, S/O NARAYANAMURTHY, AGE 52 YEARS, OCCU. POLICE CONSTABLE PC NO 710, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASST SUB INSPECTOR (ASI) AT TRAFFIC N, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more MANDAMUS to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in not acting upon the representations 2 made by the Petitioner vide Dated 11.11.2019 to restore her name in the Service Register of 3rd Respondent as his wife and nominee which is highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contrary to law and violative of Articles 300-A and 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to forthwith act upon the Representation made by the Petitioner vide dated 11.11.2019 to restore the Petitioner name in the Service Register of 3rd Respondent as his wife and nominee and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. AKHIL KRISHNAN The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The petitioner herein filed representation dated 11.11.2009 to restore her name in the service register of 3rd respondent as wife and nominee. 2. The petitioner has brought to the notice of this Court that pending consideration of the Writ Petition, the 3rd respondent died on 09.06.2023. 3. Without going into the merits of the case, the 2nd respondent is directed to dispose of the representation dated 11.11.2009 made by the petitioner, in accordance with law after giving notice to any affected party. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. It is needless to say that the 2nd respondent shall dispose of the representation within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 10.09.2026 Harin 4 67 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 7375 of 2021 Date: 10-09-2026 Harin