Ravikanti Narayana Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/5966/2021 · 2026-08-09
Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2021
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1116 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2021 DAILYLAW 1116 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: Crl.P.No.5966 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
17.
01.07.2026
GTK,J
I.A.No.1 of 2026
The present application is filed to recall the
order dated 19.02.2026, which was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Heard Sri V.V.L.N. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. S. Manaswi, learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati,
learned counsel for the respondent No.2, and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the Respondent-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that upon receiving the instructions he filed the affidavit and he has also explained to the petitioners the reasons for his inability to be present on that day. The said reasons were stated at paragraph No.2 of the affidavit.
Ms. S. Manaswi, learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for respondent No.2, reported no objection to allow this application.
Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit
and also with the consent of the respondents, the application is allowed. Crl.P.No.5966 of 2021
Post on 14.07.2026 under the caption ‘for hearing’.
________ GTK, J KNN