IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI M. F. A. NO.2519 OF 2019 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1 . BASAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS LAKKAMMA W/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 65 YEARS 2 . PRAKASH S/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 45 YEARS 3 . VANI D/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 42 YEARS 4 . ROOPA D/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 40 YEARS 5 . USAH D/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 37 YEARS 6 . NARENDRA S/O LATE BASAPPA AGE 35 YEARS 2 ALL ARE RESIDING AT SEEGEHATTI, SHIVAMOGGA. ...APPELLANTS [BY SRI. SANGAMESH G PATIL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1 . THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUSITION OFFICER UTP, SHIVAMOGGA. 2 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KNNL, UTP SHIVAMOGGA. …..RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.11.2010 IN LAC.NO.34/2006 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE SHIVAMOGGA AND ETC. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal was filed on 20.03.2019. Matter was listed before the Court on 14.06.2019. Three weeks time was granted for compliance of the office objections. Matter was listed on 06.09.2019. Two weeks time granted for compliance of office objections. 2. Again, matter was listed on 07.02.2020. Two weeks time granted to comply with office objections and it was 3 observed that if the office objections are not complied within such period, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal. 3. Today, the case was called out twice. None appeared for the appellant. Further, it is observed that in spite of granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, the appellant has not complied the office objections. It seems that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. SD/- JUDGE rs/GRD