Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2021 DAILYLAW 1079 (HP)

GAURI DUTT v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CMP.M/1291/2026 · 2026-08-13

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2021

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Gauri Dutt vs. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No. 3548 of 2021. 13.08.2026 Present: Mr. Kulbir Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents- State. CMP(M) No. 1291 and 1292 of 2026. By way of these two applications, a prayer has been made to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole petitioner and also for condonation of delay in 0ling the application. Learned counsel for the applicants has informed the court that the sole petitioner, Shri Gauri Dutt, expired on 01.02.2026. The applicants are the wife and the children of the deceased petitioner. He submits that there is a delay of 19 days in 0ling the application as some time was consumed in obtaining the death certi0cate and also other documents which were required to be appended with the application. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the State has no objection in case the applications are allowed. Having heard learned counsel for the applicants, these two applications are allowed as prayed for. The proposed legal representatives of deceased petitioner are ordered to be impleaded as petitioners No. 1(a) to 1(d). Delay in 0ling the application is condoned and abatement, if any, is ordered to be set aside. Applications stand disposed of. CWP No. 3548 of 2021. Mr. Kulbir Thakur, learned vice counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the newly impleaded petitioners. Vakalatnama is stated to have been 0led. List for consideration after four weeks. In the meantime, reply on behalf of the respondents be 0led. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 13th August, 2026. (Jai)