Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 967 (AP)

P MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY v. DR V SAHITHI VIRUPAKSHI alias POOJA

CRLP/501/2026 · 2026-06-15

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Transfer Petitionbody2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010030492026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. P MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. MR. P. SYAMPRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. CONSULTING DIRECTOR FROM HOME IN TIRUPATI R/O. FLAT NO 202, HARINI NIVASAM, SHANTI NAGAR, K . ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 517501. 1. DR V SAHITHI VIRUPAKSHI ALIAS POOJA, W/O .P.MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY (D/O. V. G.SIVASANKARA REDDY), AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. DENTIST/DENTIST 7 YEARS OF EXP. TILL SEP/OCT 2020), UNKNOWN OCCUPATION (PRESENT), R/O. DOOR NO. 19 BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH _COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI - 522239. Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High CourtPleased to set aside the impugned Docket Order dt.21/11/2025 passed in IA. No.1284/ the Hon'ble Court of the Judge, Family Court Tirupati, because the Trial Court committed illegality by giving a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 501/2026 P MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. MR. P. SYAMPRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. CONSULTING DIRECTOR FROM HOME IN TIRUPATI R/O. FLAT NO 202, HARINI NIVASAM, SHANTI NAGAR, K . ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND DR V SAHITHI VIRUPAKSHI ALIAS POOJA, W/O .P.MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY (D/O. V. G.SIVASANKARA REDDY), AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. DENTIST/DENTIST-TUTOR IN HYDERABAD (6 TO 7 YEARS OF EXP. TILL SEP/OCT 2020), UNKNOWN OCCUPATION T), R/O. DOOR NO. 19-12-199, PAVANI NAGAR, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501 THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH _COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 522239. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): etition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High CourtPleased to set aside the impugned Docket Order dt.21/11/2025 passed in IA. No.1284/2025 in F.C.O.P: No306/2023 in the Hon'ble Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, because the Trial Court committed illegality by giving a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM P MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. MR. P. SYAMPRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. CONSULTING DIRECTOR - WORK FROM HOME IN TIRUPATI R/O. FLAT NO 202, HARINI NIVASAM, SHANTI NAGAR, K . ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED DR V SAHITHI VIRUPAKSHI ALIAS POOJA, W/O .P.MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY (D/O. V. G.SIVASANKARA REDDY), AGED ABOUT TUTOR IN HYDERABAD (6 TO 7 YEARS OF EXP. TILL SEP/OCT 2020), UNKNOWN OCCUPATION 199, PAVANI NAGAR, 517501 THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH _COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, - ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): etition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High CourtPleased to set aside the impugned Docket 2025 in F.C.O.P: No306/2023 in V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, because the Trial Court committed illegality by giving a direction to 2 MRK,J Crl.P.No.501 of 2026 issue notice to the Respondent, in Perjury proceedings, against the settled law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Pritish v. State of Maharashtra (2002) 1 SCC 253, which was again confirmed and reaffirmed by the 3-Judge Bench of Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh 2020 INSC 226; II. Consequently, pleased to direct the learned Trial Court to conduct inquiry on the basis of record or prima facie evidence already before the Court by following the procedure contemplated u/s.379 and 215 of BNSS (340 and 195 of Cr.P.C.), expeditiously preferably within a time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble High Court; III. Pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of Docket Order dated 19/01/2026 passed in I:A. No.1284/2025 in F.C.O.P. No.306/2023 in the Hon'ble Court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, with liberty to file the same as early as it becomes available; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. SAIDILIP A 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 MRK,J Crl.P.No.501 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Mr. P.Mohith Sundar Reddy, who is party in person, filed a memo dated 15.06.2026 vide USR.No.57613 of 2026, seeking permission to withdrawn the present Criminal Petition with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Dated: 16.06.2026 MDP