Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 957 (AP)

M/s. SRI SANKARAS D.Ed COLLEGE v. V CHINNA VEERABHADRUDU

CC/355/2020 · 2026-04-06

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010101512020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 355/2020 Between: 1. M/S. SRI SANKARAS D.ED COLLEGE, MARUTHI NAGAR, KURNOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 2. M/S. ANKALA REDDY MEMORIAL TEACHER TRAINING COURSE KURNOOL, , REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 3. M/S. SRI VENKATESWARA D.ED COLLEGE ATMAKUR, , KURNOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 4. M/S. SRI SIDDHARTHA COLLEGE OF D.ED, KURNOOL, , REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 5. M/S. SRI VENKATESWARA D.EI.ED COLLEGE PEDDPALLY, , KURNOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 6. M/S. SAS D.E1. ED COLLEGE BRAHMANAKOTKURU, , KURNOOL REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 7. M/S. ANASUYA-COLLEGE OF DIPLOMA IN EDUCATION TUGGALI, KURNOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 8. M/S. MADINA D.EI. ED COLLEGE, BRAHMANAKOTKUR, NANDIKOTKUR, KURNOOL REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 9. M/S. SRI BHARATHI E.EI.ED COLLEGE NANDYAL, KURNOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. V CHINNA VEERABHADRUDU, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. SRI A SUBBA REDDY, WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS, OPP. TO ANDHRA HOSPITALS, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI PRATHAP REDDY, WORKING AS DIRECTOR, THE STATE COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING, ANJANEYA TOWERS, LBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. SRI DEVENDER REDDY, WORKING AS CONVENER DEECET 2017, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION KAKINADA, EAST GO LAVARI DISTRICT, AP 5. SRI MUNNAIAH, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL, GOVT. DIET, TANDRAPADU, KURNOOL - 518007 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully disobeying the orders of the Hon'ble High Court parsec in IA No. 2 of 2019 in WP No. 6760. of 2019 dated 4.09.2019 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B CHANDRASEN REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 355/2020 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.09.2019 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6760 of 2019. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pending the contempt case, the Writ Petition itself is disposed of vide order dated 11.07.2022. As such no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.04.2026 TTPPSS 4 117 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 355/2020 07.04.2026 TTPPSS