IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.3629 of 2020 Decided on: 24th March, 2026 Joginder Singh .......Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening developments and efflux of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of statement made by learned vice counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) March 24, 2026 Judge (naveen) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.