Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 915 (GAU)

Hage Monya and 2 others v. The State of AP and 5 Others

WP(C)/366/2020 · 2026-08-06

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040009782020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/366/2020 Hage Monya and 2 others D/O HAGE KOYANG, PRESENLTY POSTED AS ASSITANT DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES, DIRECTORATE OF INDUSTRIES, ITANAGAR, RESIDENT OF P SECTOR, NEAR MITHUN GATE, PO/PS ITANAGAR, PAPUMPARE DISTRICT, AP. 2: NITNAM PADUN Age: Occupation : D/O ONIT PANYANG PADUN PRESENTLY POSTED AS CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (CDPO) GEKU ICDS PROJECT GEKU PO/PS GEKU UPPER SIANG DISTRICT AP. 3: RIMO DONI Age: Occupation : S/O YORRI DONI PRESENTLY POSTED AS CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER (CDPO) ITALIHA ICDS PROJECT TALIHA PO/PS UPPER SIANG DISTRICT AP VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Others THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF AP, ITANAGAR. 2:THE CHIEF SECRETARY Age: 0 Page No.# 2/3 Occupation : GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 3:THE SECRETARY Age: 0 Occupation : PERSONNEL GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 4:THE SECRETARY (INDUSTRIES) Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT. OF A P ITANAGAR. 5:THE SECRETARY Age: 0 Occupation : WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 6:THE ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Age: 0 Occupation : THROUGH THE SECRETARY APPSC ITANAGAR Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging, Sr. Adv, D Tamuk,M Gibi,M Doji Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Ajin Apang, Sr. Advocate,S/C APPSC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 07-08-2026 Mr. D. Panging, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has Page No.# 3/3 become infructuous, in view of the subsequent selection being held for the post involved in the present writ petition. Accordingly, he prays that the above noted writ petitions be closed as having become infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned Sr. counsel for the petitioners, the above noted writ petitions stand closed on being rendered infructuous, JUDGE Comparing Assistant