Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 906 (AP)

YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA v. MUTYALA RAJU

CC/473/2020 · 2026-04-08

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010141732020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473 OF 2020 Between: 1. YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA, YARAKALA RAMA KRISHNA FATHER NAME MUSALAYYA AGE 60, ADDRESS R/O. BANGARUGUDEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. BURLA VENKATESWARA RAO, FATHER NAME. GANGA RAO AGE. 47, HINDU, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. BANGARUGUDEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MUTYALA RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 2. P RACHANA, W/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 40 ABOUT, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU REVENUE DIVISION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. BSVSRL RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents/Contemnors for their willful disobedience of order Dt. 17.03.2020 in I.A.NO. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No. 6723 of 2020 on the file of this Honble Court and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner herein on 28-09-2020 in CC 473/2020 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) The Court made the following order: The instant contempt case is filed complaining willful disobedience of the interim orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.6723 of 2020. 2. It is stated that the said writ petition has been subsequently disposed of vide order dated 26.09.2023, observing that the grievance of the petitioner has been resolved. 3. Having regard to the same, interim order passed in the writ petition merged with the final order passed in the writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 09.04.2026 BSK 3 50 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 473 OF 2020 Dated: 09.04.2026 BSK