Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 901 (GAU)

Priyangka Tayeng v. The State of AP and Others

WP(C)/327/2020 · 2026-07-02

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008552020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/327/2020 Priyangka Tayeng W/O LT. CT. PRADIP TAYENG, VILLAGE MAHADEVPUR, PO/PS MAHADEVPUR, DISTRICT NAMSAI, AP. VERSUS The State of AP and Others REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF AP, ITANAGAR. 2:THE COMMISSIONER (HOME) Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PHQ ITANAGAR Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 4:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PHQ ITANAGAR Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE Age: 0 Occupation : AMJAW DISTRICT GOVT. OF A P ANJA Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : Arup Bhatttacharjee, Dhananjoy Taye Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 03.07.2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. Y. Riram, learned State Counsel for the respondents, is present. On the previous occasion also, i.e. on 10.12.2025, the petitioner remained unrepresented. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant