Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 887 (GAU)

JELEKA KHATUN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/1223/2020 · 2026-06-16

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/2 GAHC010033522020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1223/2020 JELEKA KHATUN W/O. LT. SANBOR ALI, R/O. MERUATTARI, P.S. MUKALMUA, DIST. NALBARI, PIN-781126. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 4:THE DY. COMMISSIONER NALBARI DIST. NALBARI PIN-781335. 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BARKHETRI REVENUE CIRCLE DIST. NALBARI PIN-781126. 6:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE Page No. 2/2 NALBARI DIST. NALBARI PIN-781335. 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE MUKALMUA POLICE STATION DIST. NALBARI PIN-781126 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID, MS. M R DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, SC, FINANCE,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 17.06.2026 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner today on call. On the previous date of listing i.e. on 01.06.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 4, 5, 6 & 7; and Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for the respondent no. 2 have submitted that in this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to release a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as ex-gratia in terms of a Notification dated 14.11.2014 of the Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Government of Assam and therefore, otherwise also, the writ petition suffers from lack of merit, as the issue has been decided by a Coordinate Bench and also, by the Division Bench of this Court. As the petitioner is not found to be interested to pursue the writ petition, which is apparent from their repeated absence on two dates and therefore, the writ petition, without going into the merit of the case, is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant