NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. ABED ALI and 5 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/101/2020 · 2026-05-05
Mridul Kumar Kalita
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 868 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 868 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010319312019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/101/2020 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD MUMBAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT ULUBARI GUWAHATI. VERSUS ABED ALI and 5 ORS S/O LATE HAZARAT ALI R/O VILL. KAWRPARA P.O. SUKAMANAH P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
2:ON THE DEATH OF ABDUS SALAM HIS LEGAL HEIRS AYESHA KHATUN W/O LATE ABDUS SALAM R/O AT VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
3:LOKMAN ALI S/O LATE ABDUS SALAM R/O AT VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
4:SHARUK ALI S/O LATE ABDUS SALAM
Page No.# 2/4 R/O AT VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
5:SAIFUL ISLAM S/O LATE ABDUS SALAM R/O AT VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
6:NUR AHMED S/O LATE ABDUS SALAM R/O AT VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. R K BHATRA Advocate for : appearing for ABED ALI and 5 ORS
Linked Case : MFA/51/2016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING 87 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD MUMBAI AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI. VERSUS ABED ALI and ANR.
S/O LATE HAZARAT ALI R/O VILL. KAWRPARA P.O. SUKAMANAH P.S. and DIST. BARPETA ASSAM.
2:MD. ABDUS SALAM S/O IMAN ALI
Page No.# 3/4 R/O VILL. ITERVITA P.O. BARBALA P.S. and DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR A SAIKIA Advocate for : appearing for ABED ALI and ANR.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER Date-06.05.2026
1. Heard Ms. A. Biyani, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. P. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. R. Patgiri, the
learned counsel for the respondent No.1.
2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for substituting all the legal heirs of the deceased respondent No.2 late Abdus Salam.
3. The learned counsel for the claimant/respondent has not opposed the prayer.
4. Considering the ground stated in the instant Interlocutory Application, the prayer is allowed.
5. The legal heirs for the deceased respondent No. 2 Abdus Salam are allowed to be substituted in his place.
6. Accordingly, Ms. Ayesha Khatun, Lokman Ali, Sharuk Ali, Saiful Islam and Nur Ahmed are allowed to be substituted as the respondent Nos. 2(a) 2(b) 2(c) 2(d) and 2(e) in place of the deceased respondent No.2 Abdus Salam.
Page No.# 4/4
7. The appellant shall submit the corrected amended cause title in the connected MFA No. 51/2016 within a period of one week from the date of this
order.
8. This Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant