Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 860 (GAU)

Pebom Bagra v. The State of AP and 3 Others

WP(C)/339/2020 · 2026-04-27

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008972020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/339/2020 Pebom Bagra S/O LT. T. BAGRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TAX, EXCISE AND NARCOTICS, GOVT. OF AP, RESIDENT OF F SECTOR, QUARTER NO. 15, ITANAGAR DISTRICT, PAPUM PARE, AP. VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Others THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF AP, ITANAGAR, AP. 2:THE COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Occupation : DEPARTMENT OF TAX EXCISE AND NARCOTICS GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR AP. 3:THE SECRETARY Age: 0 Occupation : DEPT. OF TAX EXCISE AND NARCOTICS GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR. 4:ANDO PANGKAM Age: 0 Occupation : DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER TAX EXCISE AND NARCOTICS Page No.# 2/2 GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR Advocate for the Petitioner : Kamal Saxena, Tate Tatak,1 P K Tiwari, Sr. Advocate Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Dicky Panging,T Tayeng,D Tamuk,M Doji BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 28.04.2026 Ms. M. Bori, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents No. 1 to 3 and Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4, are present. In view of the submission made by Ms. Bori, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant