Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010146122020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4319/2020 BIRAJ SARMA AND ANR S/O LATE BIREN SARMA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 28, NANDAN PUR, SURVEY BELTOLA, OPPOSITE CID OFFICER, GUWAHATI, PO BELTOLA, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 2: MS. PALLABI SARMA W/O BIRAJ SARMA RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 28 NANDAN PUR SURVEY BELTOLA OPPOSITE CID OFFICER GUWAHATI PO BELTOLA DIST KAMRUP M ASSA VERSUS UCO BANK AND ANR A BANKING COMPANY HAVING ITS ZONAL OFFICE AT MANI RAM DEWAN ROAD, PO SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI 781003, KAMRUP M ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2:BRANCH MANAGER UCO BANK DOWN TOWN BRANCH SAHARIA COMPLEX. GROUND FLOOR RUKMINIGAON GS ROAD GUWAHATI 781022 KAMRUP M ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T BARUAH, MR. R PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC. UCO BANK, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 31-03-2026 Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner after attempting to argue the matter at some length, considering the contention raised by the respondent in the affidavit filed in the matter, wherein it has been highlighted that the proceeding under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, has already been instituted and symbolic possession of the security has already been taken, submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition to approach the Bank authority and/ or appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. The prayer is not objected to by Mr. P.C. Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent Bank. Accordingly, in view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant