SUNITA SINGH BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS.
WP(C)/5246/2020 · 2026-01-26
N Unni Krishnan Nair
Writ Petition (Civil)body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 841 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 841 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010174732020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5246/2020 SUNITA SINGH BARMAN W/O- BIPUL BARMAN, UBC/4164, R/O- BLOCK B. QUARTER NO. 11, POLICE RESERVE, PALTAN BAZAR, GHY, KAMRUP (M), GHY-01 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS. REP. BY ITS COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT., DISPUR- 781006 2:THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT. BLOCK-D 2ND FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN (CIVIL) DISPUR GHY-06 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. (ESTT-A) DISPUR GHY-06 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GHY-07 5:THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION) ULUBARI GHY-07
Page No.# 2/4 6:DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (MODERNIZATION OF POLICE COMMUNICATION) ULUBARI GHY-07 7:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE GUWAHATI PANBAZAR GHY-01 8:THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (ADMINISTRATION) OFFICE OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GHY ASSAM 9:THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (RESERVE) POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GHY PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI 10:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GHY-29 11:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX CENTRAL BLOCK 6TH FLOOR BELTOLA ROAD HOUSEFED GHY-0 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR, MS. S KAKATI,MR. R BARTHAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG,SC, FINANCE
Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER Date : 27.01.2026
1. Mr. S Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter, on being referred for mediation, the parties had appeared before the mediator and during the course of the mediation process, the matter was amicably settled between the parties. He submits that a memorandum of settlement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was also filed by the parties to the proceeding.
2. Mr. S Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the respondent authorities have already issued orders authorizing to the petitioner compassionate family pension and the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. However, he submits that the amounts due have not been credited to the account of the petitioner in terms of the settlement arrived at.
3. Mr. P Nayak, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State respondents and Mr. A Baruah, learned Standing counsel, Accountant General, A.N.E, Assam submits that the amount involved shall be credited to the account of the petitioner within a period of 1(one) month from today.
4. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, there being no live issue arising in the petition for adjudication, the present Writ Petition need not be detained any further. Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to
Page No.# 4/4 release to the petitioner her dues in terms of the settlement arrived at in the matter and the petitioner, for the purpose, shall extend full cooperation in the matter and if so mandated, shall appear before the Treasury Officer, Kamrup (M) within a period of 7(seven) days from today.
5. With the above observations, the present writ petition stands
disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant