ASHOK KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA TH HOME SECY AND ORS
WP(C)/931/2020 · 2026-09-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 831 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 831 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 931/2020 CM No .2301/2020
Ashok Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
U.O.I & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rohan Nanda, CGSC.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (03.09.2026)
01. The record reveals that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 31.05.2022 and 05.08.2022. Thereafter, when the matter was listed on 29.10.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner was granted time to furnish a copy of the rejoinder to learned counsel for the respondents.
02. Today, when the instant petition is taken up, Mr. Rohan Nanda, learned CGSC, submits that the order dated 29.10.2024 has not been complied with. There is also no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition.
03. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, along with the connected application(s).
04. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 03.09.2026 Renu
Serial No. 74