Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 822 (PAT)

Vinod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

MJC/1269/2020 · 2026-05-07

Rajiv Roy

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1269 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23304 of 2019 ====================================================== 1. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Ram Babu Ram R/o Village- Kalandra, P.O.- Injore, P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal. 2. Ajay Kumar S/o Shri Ramtapeshwar Singh R/o Village- Ataulah, P.O.- Pariyari, P.S.- Khirimore, District- Patna. 3. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Suresh Singh R/o Vill. and P.O.- Minjahara, Via- Goh, District- Aurangabad. 4. Bijay Ram S/o Nathun Ram, R/o Vill.- Alhanpure Chauki, (Narayan Bigha), P.O.- Shakry Khurd, P.S.- Mehandia, District- Arwal. 5. Birendra Ram S/o Shri Butan Ram R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.O.- Masadpur, P.S.- Palasi, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar. 2. Shri Sanjay Kumar The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Dr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, IAS, The Director, Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Rina Kumari, The District Education Officer, Arwal. 5. Shri Parsuram Singh, The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Arwal. 6. Anil Kumar Yadav, The Block Education Officer, Sonbhadra Banshi, Suryapur, Arwal, District- Arwal. 7. Krishna Yadav, The Panchayat Secretary-cum- Niyojan Unit Sonbhadra, Gram Panchayat, Banshi Suryapur Prakhand, District- Arwal. 8. Devyanti Devi, The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj Sonbhadra Panchayat, Banshi Suryapur Prakhand, District- Arwal. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.( Ag ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 07-05-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the Patna High Court MJC No.1269 of 2020(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 following relief(s) "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated passed in CWJC No." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ court’s order stands complied. 4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U