MOHD ALTAF SHAH v. GHULAM QADIR LANGOO PROPRIETOR NEW ZEENAT GUEST HOUSE
CRM(M)/74/2020 · 2026-08-14
Shahzad Azeem
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 821 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 821 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 74/2020 CrlM(165/2020) MOHD ALTAF SHAH …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs.
GHULAM QADIR LANGOO PROPRIETOR NEW ZEENAT GUEST HOUSE ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 14.08.2026 In terms of order dated 29.05.2026, fresh steps for service of respondent have not been taken. Be that as it may. For the last two consecutive dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 14.08.2026 Ishaq