Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 809 (PAT)

Avinash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

MJC/746/2020 · 2026-03-11

Rajiv Roy

Transfer Petitionbody2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.746 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12947 of 2019 ====================================================== Avinash Kumar S/o Late Sudhir Kumar, Resident of Village-Bazitpur, P.O. and P.S.-Barh, District Patna, State-Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, The Special Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. Dr. Ranjeet Kumar, The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. Mr. Ravi Kumar, The District Magistrate, Patna, Bihar. 5. Mr. Joty Kumar, The District Education Officer, Patna. 6. Mr. Keshav Prasad, The District Program Officer, District-Patna. 7. Mr. Arbind Kumar The Block Education Officer, Barh, District-Patna. 8. Smt. Manju Kumari, the Headmistress, Middle School Jamnichak, Barh, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 11-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties/contemnors who are willfully and deliberately not complying the order dated 01.07.2019 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 12947 of 2019.” Patna High Court MJC No.746 of 2020(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 3. A show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party no.6 and learned State counsel has taken this Court to the order passed by the District Education Officer, Patna communicated vide memo no. 1608 dated 08.06.2020 by which the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. Granting liberty to challenge the said order, the MJC No. 746 of 2020 is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U